They are a people whose wickedness and godlessness are without parallel in history. Yet they succeed in constantly replicating themselves amongst the peoples of the world, who then become the people of Gog and Magog. They started with the medieval crusades, which were so-called holy wars that Europe fought against Islam. And now, in the last stage of their unholy mission, they threaten to wage war on Iran in order to steal, in broad daylight, Iran’s oil and gas.

Their mastermind, who is both an imposter and an evil genious, creates diversions to mask their wicked deeds, and to divert attention from his ominously unfolding master-plan to eventually rule the world from Jerusalem, and to then declare himself to be the true Messiah. He seeks to mask this evil attack on Iran by resorting to the greatest diversions of all, namely the nuclear ‘scarecrow’, the utterly despicable cartoons of Prophet Muhammad (peace and blessings of Allah Most High be upon him), nauseating photographs depicting sexual abuse of Iraqi Muslims detained by the US occupation forces in Iraq, and the destruction of the golden-domed Masjid al-Askariyah and sacred Shia shrine in Iraq.

But they cannot defeat the Prophet’s religion since Allah Most High will answer the prayer of Jesus, the true Messiah (peace and blessings of Allah Most High be upon him as well), when he returns, and destroy them. They cannot silence even Nelson Mandela and Harry Belafonte who continue to courageously denounce them for their terrorism, arrogance and evil deeds. 

But for now we continue to watch in amazement as they deliberately and diabolically antagonize Muslims around the world with these cartoons and photographs, and in the process, cleverly create opportunities for their many clients, so-called Muslim leaders who serve them as house-slaves, to seek to rebuild their tattered credentials as champions of Islam. These clients will now loudly protest, even though they never shed a teardrop for Haiti, and never lifted even a little finger when Iraq and Afghanistan were attacked and occupied. But they will now beat the drums of war in a fearsome display of hypocrisy.

And as the secularized world recoils from the crescendo of Muslim protest, and yet another massive terrorist attack on some holy western target conveniently occurs, Israel would seek to convert public opinion to her cause of waging war on Iran in order to save the world from Islam. Smart, isn’t it? Yet quite unworthy of the so-called “chosen people” of Almighty God!

They plan their plans, and He plans His plans, and He is the best of planners!


I wish and I pray, Insha Allah, that war on Iran does not take place. But it now appears certain that the Anglo-American-Israeli triple alliance will launch an unjust war on Iran as soon as they are convinced that they cannot strike a deal with that Shia Muslim country, and as soon as the managed formalities are over. While we refrain in this essay from speculating on the substance of such a deal, we recognize that only a deal with a quid pro quo can avert war.

We analyze possible consequences of war on Iran and suggest that this time it may not be yet another Anglo-American war waged on Euro-Israel’s behalf. Rather, Euro-Israel will step out from behind the curtains that have hitherto cleverly concealed her, and assume her pre-planned leadership role in waging her own war in her own interest. USA and Britain would then play uncomfortably new supporting roles in this final stage of their unholy triple alliance. Such an Israeli-led war could possibly witness the introduction of new weapons of warfare never used or even seen before.

Despite western calculations that paint a rosy picture of such a war delivering to the West, and hence to Israel, control over Iran’s oil and gas, in addition to the rest of the Gulf oil already under their direct and indirect control, the several uncertainties that attend such a war could precipitate events with calamitous consequences for USA in particular. Israel, also, would ‘appear’ to succeed in that war while oblivious of the fact that an attack on Islamic Iran coming after the European colonization of Iraq and Afghanistan would effectively seal Israel’s fate. It would make possible the fulfillment of Prophet Muhammad’s prophesy that a Muslim army would liberate all Muslim territories starting with Khorasan (i.e., territory in and around Afghanistan) and remain unstoppable in its onward march until it eventually liberates Jerusalem.

War on Iran would certainly affect the price of oil and that, in turn, could function as the catalyst that would cause the rapid meltdown of the fraudulent US dollar, and culminate with USA losing its dominant position as the ruling state in the world. In a surprise of all surprises, Israel could then replace USA as the new ruling state in the world, while controlling the new electronic money-system of the world that would then totally replace paper-money.

If and when Israel does achieve such a status it would appear to take the Euro-Jewish State one step closer to realizing her so-called Biblical messianic destiny. But the view from Islam is that the reality of such a development would be quite the opposite. And as Islam’s view is finally confirmed it would validate Islam’s claim to truth.

Experts of strategic affairs, as well as political analysts of events now rapidly unfolding in the world, usually shy away from this topic for fear of loss of earnings and prestige, and because of an even greater fear of the charge of “anti-Semitism”. They should no longer resist the compelling evidence that there is a crucially important religious (scriptural and eschatological) dimension to this subject which, if not accepted and carefully studied, would result in woefully inadequate understanding of those events. And unless one understands the ominously unfolding world in this, the last stage of history, one can never hope to respond correctly to its many challenges.

When this subject is adequately explained, on the other hand, it boosts the morale of those Muslims, few as they may be, who have the courage and integrity to proclaim the words of the Qur’an:

“Say! Verily my prayer, and my service of sacrifice, and my very living and dying are all for Allah – the Lord-God of all the worlds. No partner hath He: this am I commanded, and I am the first of those who bow to His Will.”
(Qur’an, al-An’am, 6:162-3)

And they respond, come what may, by courageously resisting the oppressor!

There are multitudes today, however, who have become carbon-copies of Gog and Magog. “They have eyes and yet do not see, ears and yet do not hear, hearts and yet do not understand.” They are usually led by those who worship at the altar of a US visa. “They are just like cattle,” and they have a status that is less than a footnote on this momentous page of the book of history. They are like the people of Noah. The few who were with Noah in the Ark looked down as that multitude perished in the water and left behind a grim divine warning that it could be the fire next time.

This is not the Biblical Israel of David and Solomon (peace and blessings of Allah Most High be upon them both) but, rather, an imposter state. Truth is incompatible with blasphemy, decadence, lies, deception, oppression, state-sponsored terrorism, etc. This Israel is taking its people, their friends and supporters, down a road that would culminate with the greatest divine punishment. Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) prophesied that end of history more than a thousand years ago.


The propaganda machine of the international news media is now busy supporting the western diplomacy of intimidation and blackmail that targets Iran, and consequently prepares the world for an attack on Iran’s nuclear plants (and other related facilities). They must have made a secret deal with Russia, China and India, perhaps offering to share with them Iran’s oil and gas after they grab it, in order to win their support for referring Iran to the UN Security Council. There are many others who today vote with fear of the oppressor and are intimidated to reluctantly support him in his oppression. And then there is my Venezuelan neighbor, Hugo Chavez, who, like Malcolm X, has no fear and cannot be bought!

They are craftily laying the foundation for justifying blatant aggression on the grounds that they exhausted all possible peaceful responses to what is made to appear a grave potential Iranian/Muslim nuclear threat to Israel and to the world. Consider the following four quotes of misinformation randomly selected:
“We should see that we use and exhaust to the best of our powers the diplomatic solutions that remain available,” said German Foreign Minister Franz-Walter Steinmeier last week.

The International Atomic Energy Agency, the U.N. nuclear watchdog, today reported Iran to the U.N. Security Council in a resolution expressing concern that Tehran’s nuclear program may not be “exclusively for peaceful purposes”:
Iran is determined to have nuclear weapons, especially under the administration of President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, who’s angered Europeans by calling for Israel to be “wiped off the map” and saying that the Holocaust was “a myth.”

Iran has been pursuing nuclear weapons for years, but now, in the framework of President Ahmadinejad’s second Islamic revolution, they fit perfectly. He not only wants them, he wants to use them as a threat to expand Islamic influence.

But Jewish Israel, in fact, faces no nuclear threat at all from a Muslim country whose strict Islamic government has not only chosen to maintain Iran’s membership in the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, as well as to strictly comply with its obligation under that Treaty not to acquire nuclear weapons, but has also gone on public record in its opposition, on Islamic religious grounds, to the use of nuclear weapons in warfare.

In addition, and as in the previous case of Iraq, there is no evidence at all that Iran is even remotely close to being ‘capable’ of acquiring nuclear weapons, or even that Iran has chosen to secretly pursue such an unethical effort.


If Iran were to secretly seek to develop nuclear weapons while publicly denying such, then whenever that is confirmed it would result in a devastating and irreparable loss of the regime’s Islamic credentials. After all, the Qur’an has firmly commanded Muslims to honor treaty obligations:

“O ye who believe! Fulfill (all) obligations (and this includes treaty obligations)…………….”
(Qur’an, al-Maidah, 5:1)

Islamic Iran therefore has a religious duty to honor its obligation under the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty to refrain from the development and acquisition of nuclear weapons. In addition to that religious duty to negotiate in “good faith” and to honor treaty obligations, Iran’s leadership position of the Shia Islamic world and its continuing rivalry with Sunni Islam should be sufficient to convince the world that Shia Iran would never commit such an act of religious suicide (i.e., violating its solemn treaty obligations).

The problem that we now face is that today’s Judeo-Christian Euro-world-order is incapable of trusting anyone at all. They have established a record of deceit, cunning, double standards and lies in the conduct of their affairs with the non-European world. They have given their word and then broken that word time and again. They have repudiated and violated solemn treaty obligations time and again. They have planned and executed terrorist attacks upon innocent people in many parts of the world, including their own cities, and then blamed it on others in order to justify war on Afghanistan, Iraq and Islam. The nuclear impasse with Iran, and the dubious justification that it provides for war on that country, are obviously deliberately and maliciously contrived.

The western world has established an immoral norm in the ethics of warfare in which war can now be waged on the basis of maliciously conceived presumption. This has truly ominous implications for mankind. Only Gog, Magog, bandits and scoundrels wage wars of aggression based on lies in order to seize other peoples’ oil and gas resources. Malcolm X would have warned them that “chickens do come home to roost”.

Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) on the other hand, set a lofty standard for the conduct of state in respect of the ethics of war. His Sunnah, or example, is that war is waged only in response to aggression, or in order to liberate the oppressed (on the condition that they, the oppressed, themselves cry out for help to be liberated). The Qur’anic revelation itself recognized that the blessed Prophet disliked war. But Allah Most High warned that if some men did not stand up against the wickedness of others the earth would be reduced to chaos and anarchy:

By Allah’s will they routed them: and David slew Goliath: and Allah gave him Power and Wisdom and taught him whatever (else) He willed. And did not Allah check one set of people by means of another (who would stand up to confront them), the earth would indeed be full of mischief: but Allah is full of bounty to all the worlds.”
(Qur’an, al-Baqarah, 2:251)

The modern essentially godless western man is incapable of conceiving that Iran can be speaking the truth in this matter, and is acting in accordance with a moral standard which precludes the possibility of any acquisition of nuclear weapons. Hence the West is preparing the world for yet another Judeo-Christian war of aggression against a non-European Muslim people, waged on behalf of the Euro-Jewish State of Israel. The Crusades, it would appear, would only end when Israel replaces USA as the ruling state in the world, and the false Messiah (Anti-Christ) proclaims himself to be the Messiah to the adoring applause of all those who now support Israel, and who journey to Jerusalem to pay homage to her and to thus confirm that support.

Let them know that the Qur’an has declared that this world is a moral order in which the oppressor will one day come face to face with the truly terrible consequences of his oppression. Muslims are confident that the return of the true Messiah, Jesus the son of Mary (peace and blessings of Allah Most High be upon them both) would result in the triumph of Truth in Islam.


Even as the case for western war on Iran is being built with the same lies, deception and fanatical resolve which attended the commencement of the wars on Iraq and Afghanistan, it is quite clear that a US President who faces increasing difficulties at home in defending an unpopular war on Iraq cannot easily embark upon another war on Iran. There would be serious political risks for him, and for his party, in such a dangerous and misguided military adventure. Indeed, if USA launches war on Iran, and occupies Iran’s oil belt, and this provokes an immensely strengthened armed resistance to its occupation of Iraq, Afghanistan and Iran, President Bush could be impeached. If USA cannot lead the war on Iran then it would be impossible for Britain to do so. Whether it is by design or by chance, that leaves only one European nation capable of taking the lead in a war on Iran, and that is the Euro-Jewish State of Israel.


Iran neither wants war with Israel, nor is preparing to commence one. Iran would suffer immensely from war with Israel, while Israel would hardly suffer any significant losses from a war for which she is more than adequately prepared. Israel, also, would not want to wage such war on any Muslim people at this time that would require Jewish invasion and occupation of Muslim territory. Rather, the armies of the western world as well as their client-state allies have been used as cannon-fodder for such ground combat.

Israel has been waging war on the Palestinian people with awesome firepower from the air, as well as with small fast-moving commando teams infiltrating their territory in hit-and-run missions. Israeli conventional wars have also been of very short duration (six days, for example) so that they do not allow the Muslim world sufficient time to mobilize for Jihad. If western troops hesitate to face the horrendously dangerous mission of physically occupying Iran’s oil belt, then the alternative would have to be a lightning aerial attack so powerful and destructive that it would pulverize and incapacitate Iran. Only nuclear warfare can deliver such a result. We can now understand the French President’s helping hand in preparing public opinion to accept such an eventuality. He recently warned that France would not hesitate to respond with nuclear weapons, if necessary, in the event that France became the target of a terrorist attack.

The lightning Israeli attack on Iraq’s Osiraq nuclear reactor in June 1981, shortly before the reactor was scheduled to go into operation, resulted in its complete destruction. Yet Israel has not faced any significant retaliation or suffered any loss at all from that blatant act of aggression. US-led attacks on Iraq in 1991, and again ten years later, made it impossible for that country to ever respond effectively to the Israeli aggression.

If Israel does attack Iran, its military strategy would be to cripple that country and make it impossible for Iran to mount an effective armed response. Israel would therefore expand her military targets beyond the Iranian nuclear sites, and while it is certain that fighter aircraft with guided missiles would be used to attack a host of targets scattered all over Iran, it is likely that Israel would resort to use of nuclear weapons.

Nuclear weapons could be used, for example, to so destroy Iran’s oil and gas installations that it would be impossible to restore the export of Iranian oil and gas for years to come. The consequence for the Iranian economy, which is largely dependent on oil revenues, would be disastrous. Indeed the economy would grind to a halt, and in the economic chaos that would follow, it would be unthinkable for Iran to launch any kind of conventional or nuclear war on Israel for many years to come.

Alternatively, Israel could seek to seize Iran’s oil and gas in an attempt to control the world’s oil and gas resources. A nuclear attack on Iran would result in a spectacular rise in the price of oil and that, in turn, would permit Israel to hold the world to ransom for oil while advancing her bid to establish Israeli rule over the whole world. For that reason the use of nuclear weapons could be restricted to so incapacitating Iran that it would be impossible for that country’s armed forces to defend the oil-belt that the unholy triple alliance wants to seize.


It should be clear that the primary purpose of an Israeli attack on Iran would be political, economic and strategic (grabbing Iran’s oil and gas and getting rid of a hostile Islamic regime) rather than strictly military, since Iran poses no significant military threat to either Israel or the West. What are the likely political, economic and strategic objectives of a war on Iran and how do they relate to the Euro-Jewish state’s ultimate destiny?

The use of nuclear weapons against a weaker non-nuclear-state would clearly represent a manifestly disproportionate, unjust and immoral response to a presumed distant potential threat.

But Israel’s use of nuclear weapons in an attack on Iran would advance her strategic objective of replacing USA as the ‘ruling state’ in the world since a ruling state must not only be a nuclear-weapons state but must also demonstrate its preparedness to use that power.

It is only when religious scholarship is combined with scholarship in international affairs that one can discover the ultimate Israeli strategic objective that is linked with the Jewish belief in the advent of “a Messiah who would rule the world from the throne of David, i.e., the Holy State of Israel”. The Messiah would thus restore the golden age of David and Solomon (peace and blessings of Allah Most High be upon them both) when the believers (in the One true God) ruled the world from the Holy Land. This is precisely what Jesus would do when he returns. But they rejected him as the true Messiah and are hence now condemned to be complicit in the nuclear adventure that the false Messiah is about to unleash upon an unsuspecting mankind.


If Israel succeeds in replacing USA as the ruling state in the world, such a spectacular success would certainly be used to validate the Jewish claim to ‘truth’. Christians need to be reminded, however, that the Jewish version of truth is one in which Jesus, the son of the virgin Mary, is considered to be a ‘bastard’ and an ‘imposter’ whose death “by hanging” (crucifixion is considered to be a form of hanging) confirmed him as “the cursed of the Lord-God”. (Deuteronomy, 21:23) This can hardly be expected to give comfort to the large number of Christians who have been duped into supporting the Euro-Jewish State willy-nilly on the grounds that such support fulfills Biblical prophecy.

It seems likely that Christian blindness of that true Israeli goal would persist until the true Messiah, the son of Mary, himself returns and kills the false Messiah or Anti-Christ. When, at that time, they will finally wake up to the grand deception, it would be too late to change course and avert the punishment which awaits those who persisted in their solidarity with Israel despite its godlessness, wickedness and oppression.

Christians should now carefully consider the fact that Muslims share with them common beliefs such as:
• Jesus was born of a virgin mother;
• he was the true Messiah;
• he performed many miracles;
• the Israelites were denounced for their wickedness;
• they conspired to crucify him;
• Allah Most High raised him unto Himself;
• Jesus will one day return to rule the world with justice (from Jerusalem);
• his return will result in the triumph of truth over falsehood and  justice over injustice in the world;
• his return will bring an end to history; and most Muslims as well as Christians believe that his triumphant messianic return is now imminent.

It remains now for Christians to come to Islam where they will find a Jesus who is not God, nor son of God, but His Messenger or Prophet. In Islam the One God neither begets nor is begotten, and none is like unto Him. Islam declares that God Himself made it appear unto the Jews that Jesus was crucified whereas he was not!


Whether or not nuclear weapons are used in an Israeli attack on Iran, the fact remains that such an attack would almost certainly result in an Iranian withdrawal from the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty. The Iranian people and government would then solemnly commit themselves to struggle, by any means necessary, to acquire an Iranian nuclear weapons deterrent with which to protect themselves from the bandits who now rule the world. Such a response would find clear support from the Qur’an itself that has ordered Muslims to build power to the maximum extent possible (and that most certainly includes nuclear power) so that such power might function as a deterrent and be used to protect mankind from oppression, chaos and anarchy:

“And build the maximum power that you can possibly build (to be used) against them, and this includes steeds of war (hence missiles, etc.), to strike terror into (the hearts of) the enemies of Allah as well as your enemies, and other (enemies) besides, whom ye may not know, but whom Allah doth know. Whatever ye shall spend in the Cause of Allah (for the purpose of building that military strength) shall be repaid unto you, and ye shall not be treated unjustly.”
(Qur’an, al-Anfal, 8:60)

“(And be warned that) the disbelievers are allies one of another: unless ye do this (i.e., build power and establish alliances with those who are friendly to you), there would be tumult and oppression on earth, and great anarchy.”
(Qur’an, al-Anfal, 8:73)

Indeed Mohammed-Nabi Rudaki, deputy chairman of the Iranian parliament’s National Security and Foreign Policy Commission, has already warned that his country might resign its membership in the International Atomic Energy Agency and withdraw from the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty.

The Iranians would also be following in the example of Pakistan whose then leader, Zulfiqar ‘Ali Bhutto, responded to the carefully-timed intimidation of the Indian nuclear explosion in April 1974 (India’s response to the Lahore Islamic Summit Conference of February 1974) with a national commitment to develop a Pakistani nuclear deterrent “even if we have to eat grass”. Pakistan eventually succeeded in that effort and there is no reason to doubt that the Iranians could eventually do likewise. It would only be a matter of time. An attack on Iran would thus set the world up for an Armageddon that Christians already expect. Only the deaf, dumb and blind would fail to distinguish the aggressor from the victims of aggression in that final war of all wars, and only those devoid of faith would fail to recognize that justice and truth must triumph over oppression and falsehood when the true Messiah returns. Those who have eyes and can see the truth explained in these humble essays should accept Islam (and get on board the Ark) before the deluge comes.


An Israeli attack on Iran can result in even more ominous consequences for the Euro-Jewish State since it could provoke
an already agitated Muslim people in Pakistan to such a boiling-point of resentment and anger as to threaten the very survival of the pro-American and pro-Israeli Musharraf regime in Pakistan. Many Pakistanis already despise that regime.

If the present client-regime in Pakistan were to be replaced through a military coup, or a bloody insurrection, by a leader with credentials of opposition to American and Israeli oppression and aggression against Muslims, Israel would certainly reverse her current ‘blind-eye’ towards Pakistan’s nuclear-weapons capability and argue that those weapons pose a threat to her very survival. The world would then witness yet another Judeo-Christian Euro-crusade against a non-European Muslim people.

Already it is clear that Muslim public opinion around the world is firmly in favor of such leaders who can resist western and Israeli oppression and their dirty war on Islam. It was because an opportunity presented itself for such that the last presidential election in Iran resulted in a maverick and diplomatically immature but anti-American and anti-Israeli Mayor of Teheran soundly defeating ex-President Rafsanjani who was mature and diplomatically astute but whose credentials of standing up to the oppressor were less than impressive.

It was again precisely such an opportunity that explains the electoral victory of the Palestinian Hamas Islamic resistance movement that has courageously resisted Israeli oppression, over a secular Fatah with a tarnished record in the occupied Holy Land. Indeed a western attack on Iran would almost certainly inflame Muslim public opinion around the world to such an extent that at least some pro-American leaders and regimes in the Muslim world will fall. Such a development would be a tremendous loss of face for the US administration.


It is certain that an attack on Iran would result in an instantaneous and dramatic rise in oil prices as well as the price of gold. Few people seem to realize that when the price of gold ‘goes up” it actually amounts to the value of the US dollar ‘going down’. In September 1971 the US government, having solemnly pledged its word, reneged and scrapped the Breton Woods Accord. Britain had acted in September 1971 in accordance with her rights under the Breton Woods Accord in demanding that the US government redeem for gold (at $35 per ounce of gold) a few billion dollars of British-held US dollars. USA was legally obliged to do so under international law, but did not have the gold to redeem all the dollars it had printed and put in circulation both domestically and overseas. That was fraudulent. It could have led to war. But all that happened was that US simply broke her word, reneged from her treaty obligations and scrapped the Breton Woods Accord.

The value of the US dollar has been generally based since then on market demand around the world. Specifically, however, the US dollar has kept its strength because of imperial America’s control over its oil-exporting client-states, insisting that the dollar must be the currency used for the purchase of oil.

USA was devious enough to get the world to accept that it could take any amount of paper and make money with it, and so long as mankind accepted that paper-money, and there was demand for it, USA did not have to worry about where it would find the money to pay for imports, goods, services, etc. It would simply print the paper. But USA ensured that there would be a substantial and significant demand for US paper dollars by imposing upon oil exporting countries the obligation to sell their oil for that US paper-money. The result was that the demand for US dollars remained forever strong, indeed stronger by far than the demand for any other paper money.

But war on Iran would certainly disrupt oil and gas exports from that country and could, conceivably, also result in a shut-down of the strategic Straits of Hormuz through which tankers laden with Gulf oil must pass to get to the open seas.

“If Europe does not act wisely with the Iranian nuclear portfolio and it is referred to the U.N. Security Council and economic or air travel restrictions are imposed unjustly, we have the power to halt oil supply to the last drop from the shores of the Persian Gulf via the Straits of Hormuz,” said Mohammed-Nabi Rudaki, deputy chairman of the Iranian parliament’s National Security and Foreign Policy Commission.

Twenty-five to forty percent of the world’s oil trade passes through the Straits of Hormuz, which connects the Persian Gulf to the Indian Ocean. If Iran were to carry out such a threat, other big oil producers in the region, such as the United Arab Emirates and Kuwait, would be unable to export oil to Japan, China and the rest of the world.

Oil prices could conceivably increase to $200 a barrel or more, and as the price of gold also escalates as it did in January 1980 ($850 an oz.) the US dollar would so lose value as to become a very significant liability. If some Central Banks and large corporations respond to the falling value of the dollar by turning away from the US dollar in search of a more stable currency which could store value with greater reliability, and if the proposed Iranian oil bourse succeeds in offering an alternative to the dollar for the purchase of oil, this would have disastrous consequences for the dollar. If the US dollar loses its present status as the international currency, such a collapse would bring down with it all the paper money in the world. It would also mark the end of the era of American dominance over the rest of the world as the ruling state. Such would be an entirely positive development for an Israel that is just biding its time to replace USA as the third and last ruling state in history.


An Israeli attack on Iran and a western occupation of Iran’s oil belt would provoke an instantaneous and dramatic increase in the size and power of the armed Muslim resistance to US occupation of Iraq and Afghanistan. Even more ominously, both Sunni and Shia Muslims would now jointly wage the armed struggle to liberate these territories from US occupation. Anti-war public opinion in USA would force a repetition of the US withdrawal from Vietnam. In addition US troops in places such as Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Turkey and so many other Muslim countries would either have to withdraw or go into hiding. This would imply both military and political disaster for USA and would precipitate her rapid decline as the ruling state in the world. A nuclear attack on Iran would also expose US troops in Iraq to dangerous nuclear radio-active fallout.

But it would also present to the world a carefully engineered spectacle of an Israel bereft of US protective security, hemmed in by the so-called rising tide of militant Islam, and threatened with destruction. Thus the necessary conditions would have been cleverly and deliberately created for Israel to claim a causus bellum that would justify a war that would deliver, in turn, a dramatic territorial expansion (“from the river of Egypt to the great river – the river Euphrates”). Israel would seize control of the Suez Canal as well as all the oil and gas resources in the Persian Gulf while finally embracing the Biblical frontiers of Holy Israel.

In conclusion, this is no conspiracy theory but, rather, the truth about a plan that continues to be confirmed as events unfold in the world. Nor is this essay anti-Jewish. There are Jews who oppose the wickedness of the Euro-Jewish State of Israel. There are Jews who found refuge and security in the Muslim world and lived peacefully with Muslims with honor, respect and religious freedom for more than a thousand years until they were deceived into leaving their homeland and to take up residence in the imposter State of Israel. There are Jews who do not wage war on Islam, nor support those who do so. Not only can such Jews be friends of Muslims, they can also be our allies.