وَلَقَدْ ذَرَأْنَا لِجَهَنَّمَ كَثِيرًا مِّنَ الْجِنِّ وَالإِنسِ لَهُمْ قُلُوبٌ لاَّ يَفْقَهُونَ بِهَا وَلَهُمْ أَعْيُنٌ لاَّ يُبْصِرُونَ بِهَا وَلَهُمْ آذَانٌ لاَّ يَسْمَعُونَ بِهَا أُوْلَـئِكَ كَالأَنْعَامِ بَلْ هُمْ أَضَلُّ أُوْلَـئِكَ هُمُ الْغَافِلُونَ
{Quran 7:179}
“. . . . they have hearts and yet do not understand, they have eyes and yet do not see, they have ears and yet do not hear; Such people are just like cattle. . . .”
(Qur’an, al-‘Araaf, 7:179)
Those who see with two eyes, the internal as well as the external, would recognize ‘Zionism’ and ‘Zionist Imperialism’ written all over the well-armed and long-planned insurrection which toppled the Libyan government. This was no spontaneous popular uprising of a people against their dictatorial ruler as the Zionist-controlled news media around the world would have us believe. Nor was the regime toppled because the people responded with rage to the regime’s alleged slaughter of innocent protestors. That is the brain-washing that passes for news and is swallowed by cattle as Truth.
It is quite easy to recognize Zionist intimidation and control of news media when mainstream newspapers radio and television around the world (including Al-Jazeerah) adamantly refuse to question the blatantly false official explanation of the 9/11 terrorist attack on America.
The bitter truth is that there are many Libyan Muslims who will now be mercilessly killed unless they submit and embrace the new blood-stained dictatorship which has been imposed upon them at the point of a Zionist sword.
Using a barbarian strategy which came from the ‘beast of the earth’, the forces of insurrection struck their final Satanic blow at dusk in the month of Ramadan when believers were breaking their day-long fast. They embarked on an indiscriminate killing-spree intended to instill panic in the Libyan capital city of Tripoli and to thus destabilize its military defense. More than a thousand innocent Libyan Muslims became shuhada – having just completed a day of fasting – as they were mercilessly mowed down with weapons supplied by the Zionist Kuffar. Only a brain-washed people would accept that satanic warfare as a spontaneous popular uprising.
I suspect there are some in Egypt who would have sleepless nights if a substantial reward were to be offered for credible information of how so many weapons – capable of outmatching a standing army – reached the insurrectionists in Libya, – perhaps from across the Egyptian border? With all their weapons however, the insurrectionists could never have succeeded without the active and visible assistance and support of Zionism’s military arm, i.e., the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO); nor can the new government survive without NATO protection. In this sense therefore, Israel, Saudi Arabia and Libya’s new government all belong to the same group of countries whose tortured birth and continued survival cannot be explained without reference to Zionism.
NATO is already firmly established in Afghanistan and in Iraq and will never withdraw from those countries until Israel rules the world for ‘a day like a week’ and Dajjal declares himself to be the promised Messiah (see my book entitled ‘Jerusalem in the Qur’an’ for an explanation of this subject). The one-eyed do not realize that NATO is in Libya in order to protect and promote Israel’s imperial interests. Israel is about to launch big wars against the Arabs in particular, and this writer warns that the world could then face at least another 25 years of continuous war until return of the son of Mary (Allah’s blessings be upon them both – virgin mother and Messiah son). Those who see with one eye perhaps still do not realize that NATO will now seek to remain in Libya for the next 25 years.
The first implication of the above that we wish to share with our readers is that those Muslims who refuse to submit to Dajjal’s Zionist State of Israel must now part company, for their own safety, from the one-eyed active participants and vocal supporters of the Libyan insurrection. No matter how loudly they may yell and scream in response to this essay, the fact is that – unless they repent – such people are not of us and we are not of them:
{quran 5:51}
“O you who have faith (in Allah) do not take (such) Jews and (such) Christians as your friends and allies who themselves are friends and allies of each other. And whoever from amongst you turns to them (for friendship and alliance) now belong to them (and not to us). Surely Allah does not guide a wicked people.“
(Qur’an, al-Maida, 5:51)
[Note: The Qur’an does not here refer to individual friendship between a Jew and a Christian. Rather the verse anticipates the emergence of the Judeo-Christian Zionist alliance which is now waging unjust war on Islam and Muslims on Israel’s behalf.]Pakistani and Egyptian Muslims in particular must sever all ties with those within Pakistan and Egypt who dance with NATO. When the NATO attacks on Pakistan and Egypt are inevitably unleashed, such people will be used to play the same role in Pakistan and Egypt as they have just played in Libya.
I have no doubt that large numbers of Egyptians are now waking up to the dangerous implication of NATO’s success in Libya, i.e., that the noose is tightening around Egypt’s neck. This brief essay helps to explain that subject.
Israel has to expand her territorial frontiers to encompass the (false) Biblical frontiers of the Holy Land (al-Ard al-Muqaddasah). The Bible (i.e. the Torah) declares that the Holy Land extends “from the river of Egypt to the river Euphrates”. Whoever rewrote the Bible to insert this falsehood almost certainly did so because the Jews lived in the fertile Eastern Delta of Egypt for 400 years and they were also enslaved in Iraq (Babylon) for a long period of time.
No Jew will accept Dajjal’s claim to be the Messiah when he does make that claim from Jerusalem in another 20-30 years from now, unless he rules over an Israel that encompasses the Biblical frontiers of the Holy Land.
And so it is inevitable that Israel will have to attack Egypt in order to physically occupy Egypt’s Eastern Delta. The implication of NATO’s success in Libya is that Egypt would now be attacked from both East and West; and as in the case of Pakistan, so too in the case of Egypt, the strategy would be to break up both Pakistan and Egypt into small states that can easily be controlled by India and Israel. (See my essays entitled ‘Explaining Israel’s Mysterious Imperial Agenda’ and ‘Obama’s Afghan Surge, Pakistan’s Moment of Truth and Death of the US Dollar’ on my website.)
Despite his faults and eccentricities, this much we can say with confidence about Moammar Gadhafi that so long as he ruled over Libya he would never have permitted a NATO military presence in that country. It follows that so long as he ruled over Libya NATO could never launch an attack on Egypt with ground troops pouring into Egypt from across the Libyan border.
Thanks to the cattle, such an attack on Egypt is now possible. It is time therefore for every Egyptian to be armed – as every Venezuelan is armed – in preparation for what can now be clearly seen in the horizon.
We may also note that there were economic and monetary reasons as well for the shameless NATO attack on tiny Libya. The Zionists now have not only Iraqi but also Libyan oil in their control, and it seems only a matter of time before they assume direct control over Saudi oil as well. Zionist control over oil would eventually translate into Israeli oil blackmail for a world now dependent on oil for economic survival.
Finally it is reported that Libya had no foreign debts. As a consequence the Zionist-controlled international banking system could not bring this errant state under its influence and control. But the Zionists never give up. When the banking system failed to deliver this country to their control they then resorted to NATO.
There remains one part of this puzzle which defies explanation. Why did Russia and China support the UN Security Council resolution which permitted NATO military intervention in Libya? Were these two States really that dumb that they could not foresee the consequences of their support for the resolution? Or is there more to this than meets the eye?